SELF-DEALING
When the government works for one person instead of 330 million.
Sources: IRS Records · Federal Procurement Data · ProPublica · Inspector General Reports · Financial Disclosure Records · GAO Reports
The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. He shall... take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.— Article II, Sections 1 & 3 — The Take Care Clause of the United States Constitution
Self-dealing in the Trump administration operates as a system, not a series of isolated incidents. At its center is the president himself — filing a $10 billion lawsuit against his own IRS, an agency he controls, defended by lawyers he appoints, in what he described as needing to "work out a settlement with myself." Surrounding this is a network of appointees who use government resources for personal benefit and a privatized oversight apparatus run by a man with $300 billion in conflicts of interest.
The numbers across this system are staggering. DOGE promised $2 trillion in savings and delivered $215 billion — while its leader was exempted from financial disclosure requirements that apply to other officials. The Pentagon blew through $93.4 billion in a single month on a "use-it-or-lose-it" spending binge that included $6.9 million in lobster and a $98,329 Steinway grand piano — while DOGE was simultaneously cutting food assistance for struggling Americans. And nearly 3,200 disclosure records made public by ProPublica show a web of financial ties between Trump appointees and the industries they help regulate.
This is not corruption despite the system. It is corruption as the system — austerity for the vulnerable, luxury for the connected, and opacity for everyone involved.
The President's
Ledger
The most direct form of corruption: the president using the powers of his office to enrich himself personally — suing his own agencies, directing government spending to his properties, and converting government resources into personal profit.
The absurdity is structural:
• The president appoints the IRS Commissioner
• The president directs DOJ, which would defend the IRS
• The president is suing an agency he controls, defended by lawyers he appointed
• He described it as needing to "work out a settlement with myself"
A president suing his own agency for $10B is a president negotiating with himself using taxpayer money.
• The first deal was worth $500 million, with $300M sent to Venezuela and the balance held in Qatar
• Oil trader Vitol received $250M in proceeds — its senior trader donated $6M to Trump's 2024 campaign
• Qatar is the same country that gifted Trump a $400M plane
• Sen. Warren: "There is no basis in law for a president to set up an offshore account that he controls"
• The account was later moved to the US Treasury after congressional pressure
Sources: CNN, CNBC, Semafor, Rep. Doggett & Rep. Meeks investigations
• Secret Service protection requires renting rooms, golf carts, and facilities
• The president chooses to golf at his own properties
• His properties charge the government at commercial rates
• The money flows from taxpayers → US Treasury → Trump properties → Trump
Every presidential golf trip to a Trump property is a direct transfer of public money to the president's private business.
There is no way for the public to check that. The State Department published Federal Register requirements for cities bidding to host the smaller G20 meetings; Washington, Asheville and Atlanta were chosen that way. The Leaders' Summit went through no bidding process at all. CREW requested the site-selection records from State and the Secret Service, got nothing, and sued. No dollar figure has been disclosed by anyone.
He tried this in 2019 with the G7, justified it by saying the Secret Service preferred the site, and backed down after bipartisan objections; CREW later obtained internal Secret Service documents contradicting the claim.
On September 23, 2026, Marco Rubio announced that the administration has invited Vladimir Putin to attend. The Kremlin said the same day that it welcomes the invitation.
At first the White House would not say which part of the government paid. On September 29 the answer came out: Customs and Border Protection money from the 2025 reconciliation law, as the Wall Street Journal reported and Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME), who chairs Senate Appropriations, confirmed on the record: "it was taken out of funding that was supposed to be for Customs and Border Protection." Sens. Patty Murray and Chris Murphy wrote that "it appears DHS has dedicated $20 million" to the ads; CNBC found a $20 million CBP "National Media Campaign" contract awarded September 20, though the public record does not yet tie that contract to these spots. AdImpact put the first buy at $14,000. By September 24 a second government-paid ad, on the capture of Nicolás Maduro, was airing on CBS and other networks; the government produced the ads and bought the air time through an ad agency, CBS News reported.
Two distinct legal questions are in play and should not be blurred. Federal appropriations law bars spending funds for "publicity or propaganda purposes," which GAO reads to cover "self-aggrandizement" and "purely partisan" material. The Hatch Act does not apply to the president; the allegation there runs only to employees who worked on it. No finding of illegality exists. On September 25 Public Citizen asked GAO and the Office of Special Counsel to rule the ads illegal; neither has acted. Congress has sent letters: Sen. Maggie Hassan asked the White House for the cost and the contractors, and the top Democratic appropriators demanded the ads be pulled. A White House official: the ads "are clearly not political."
The objection was bipartisan. Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC): "It's inappropriate... But using taxpayer dollars, it feels like Viktor Orban." Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA): "I don't generally like to see politicians use public money to pay for their own campaign ads."
By September 28 there were at least four spots, among them a Trump 2024 campaign ad rerun during NFL games with its campaign ending cut and "Paid for by the U.S. Government" added. AdImpact's partial count passed $2.5 million for three ads in seven days, the AP reported. Majority Leader John Thune: "It's a great message. I like the message, but it shouldn't be paid for with taxpayer dollars."
By September 30 the administration had begun to confirm the basics. An administration official told Axios that "The Department of Homeland Security is placing the ad buys using money from an existing budget," and Axios reported Trump is personally selecting which ads run. AdImpact counted 2,766 airings from September 23 to 29, CNN reported. FCC Chairman Brendan Carr, a Trump appointee, dismissed Public Citizen's complaint: "There's nothing in there that strikes me to merit any sort of FCC review." Sen. Cynthia Lummis (R-WY) blocked Sen. Maggie Hassan's resolution declaring that such ads "should not be paid for by the United States government," and Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington asked DHS's inspector general to investigate possible Antideficiency Act violations.
A portfolio manager: "My gut from watching markets for 25 years is this is really abnormal. Somebody just got a lot richer."
The White House claimed the administration "does not tolerate illegally profiteering off insider knowledge" — a denial that raised its own questions by implicitly acknowledging the possibility.
Source: Salon, March 24, 2026
On the same day, CEO Devin Nunes (the former Republican congressman) stepped down, saying he'd focus more on his role as chairman of the President's Intelligence Advisory Board. His interim replacement: Kevin McGurn, who simultaneously serves as CEO of a shell company that Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump joined to purchase U.S. manufacturers (per CBS News). The incoming CEO of Trump Media is now also running a separate Trump-family acquisition vehicle.
The 2025 financials per The New Republic: $712 million net loss on $3.7 million in revenue — a loss roughly 192× revenue. Capital comes from stock dilution and a $2.5B 2025 raise for a Bitcoin treasury.
The company has secured $24 million in research contracts with U.S. military branches, including a Phase 3 SBIR award — the designation that effectively makes the firm an approved supplier for military procurement. Foundation's Phantom 2 humanoid robots are envisioned for deployment in Ukraine to inspect and transport weapons.
Eric Trump had no prior involvement in robotics before his father returned to the presidency. The administration banned foreign-made drones from federal procurement in December 2025, creating a captive market that Trump-family investments are positioned to fill.
Eric on Fox Business: "It's gonna change industry, military application, hospitality. The uses are unlimited." He did not address the conflict of holding a strategy role at a company whose largest customer is an agency reporting to his father.
Phillips O'Brien (Univ. of St. Andrews): "The U.S. government is now one of, if not the most, corrupt governments on earth."
The Musk
Problem
Elon Musk was given authority over federal spending through DOGE — the Department of Government Efficiency — while holding $300 billion in conflicts of interest across companies that depend on federal contracts and regulatory decisions.
The DOGE arrangement is historically unprecedented. Elon Musk — the world's wealthiest individual — was given authority to review and recommend cuts across the federal government while his companies held $300 billion in financial interests that directly intersected with federal policy. SpaceX holds $15 billion or more in NASA and DOD contracts. Tesla depends on EV tax credits, EPA regulations, and NHTSA safety oversight. Neuralink requires FDA approval. xAI faces emerging AI regulation.
DOGE was authorized to review spending at the very agencies that regulate these companies — and Musk was exempted from the financial disclosure requirements that apply to other government officials. The cuts that followed told the story: food assistance for the poor was reduced, the federal workforce was slashed, programs for vulnerable populations were cut. Contracts benefiting Musk's companies remained untouched. And when DOGE officials were placed under oath in March 2026, they admitted the federal deficit had actually increased since DOGE began operations.
• SpaceX — $15B+ in NASA and DOD contracts
• Tesla — EV tax credits, EPA regulations, NHTSA safety oversight
• Neuralink — FDA regulation
• xAI — AI regulation and federal AI policy
• The Boring Company — federal infrastructure contracts
DOGE was given authority to review and cut spending across the very agencies that regulate these companies.
But the real story isn't the savings gap. It's what was cut and what wasn't:
• SNAP benefits (food assistance for the poor) — cut
• Federal workforce — slashed
• Government programs for vulnerable populations — reduced
• Contracts benefiting Musk's companies — untouched
DOGE cut programs for the poor while protecting contracts for the richest man on Earth.
• No disclosure of his $300B in conflicts
• No recusal requirements when decisions affect his companies
• No transparency about which programs DOGE reviewed
• No public accounting of the basis for cuts vs. protections
The person with the largest financial conflicts in the history of the federal government was given the least oversight.
• DOGE promised $2T in savings and deficit reduction
• Under oath, officials acknowledged the deficit grew
• The admission directly contradicted months of public claims
• DOGE's cuts targeted vulnerable populations while failing its own stated objective
When forced to tell the truth under penalty of perjury, DOGE's story collapsed.
• AI chatbot — not policy experts — decided which humanities programs to eliminate
• NEH programs supporting education, preservation, and scholarship were gutted
• The process had no human expert review
• Decisions affecting millions in cultural funding made by algorithm
Federal agencies serving the American public were dismantled based on the output of a chatbot — not expertise, analysis, or public input.
The Inner
Circle
The corruption extends beyond the president to his appointees — officials who used their positions for personal benefit, faced ethics investigations, or leveraged government power for private interests.
The self-dealing culture set at the top permeated the administration's appointees. FBI Director Kash Patel flew to the Milan Olympics on a government jet. Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer faced an inspector general probe for drinking on the job, and her husband was banned from her workplace after allegations of sexual assault against a staffer. Meanwhile, Trump ally Larry Ellison positioned himself at the center of a media consolidation involving CNN, CBS, HBO, and TikTok — giving political allies unprecedented control over news coverage of the administration.
• Flew to the Milan Olympics on an FBI jet
• Reports of beer stored in a locker room at FBI headquarters
• Pattern of using government resources for personal purposes
The FBI Director's use of government aircraft for personal trips is a direct misuse of taxpayer resources — and a signal about the culture of accountability at the top of federal law enforcement.
• Her husband was banned from her workplace after allegations of sexual assault against a staffer
• An Inspector General probe was opened into reports of drinking on the job
• The IG investigation was initiated after multiple complaints from Department of Labor staff
The person responsible for protecting American workers' rights was the subject of workplace misconduct investigations in her own department.
• Connections to deals involving CNN, CBS, HBO, and TikTok
• Trump allies acquiring major media properties
• The consolidation gives political allies control over news coverage
When the president's allies control the media companies that cover the president, the free press ceases to function as a check on power.
18 U.S.C. § 209 makes it a crime to pay, or receive, any "supplementation of salary" for federal work from outside the government. Bush ethics lawyer Richard Painter: "If your employer gives you $50,000 at the end of the year, that's not a gift, that is salary." A former acting OGE director said such a payment "just doesn't happen" and would leave him "beholden to the person who gave me such a large gift." The Post found no other instance of a president giving White House staff large cash payments. The White House called the gifts "entirely permissible." Harris also sits on the Commission of Fine Arts, which reviews Trump's ballroom.
Virginia Canter of the Democracy Defenders Fund raised the same statute at issue in the cash-gifts case above: "Those are large amounts of money for a government's public servant to receive while he is, you know, in office." No enforcement body has found a violation; the rules permit gifts from personal friends, and de Becker cites a long friendship.
Separately, the Journal reported that HHS told congressional appropriators it was moving about $12 million out of the Office of Minority Health to help cover Kennedy's security, which rose from roughly $10 million to $17 million while previous secretaries ran about $5 million. That claim rests on the Journal alone. What is independently documented is that on August 25 the office terminated 16 grants worth $38 million, among them postpartum nurse home visits and infant-mortality work, and redirected the money toward "the root causes of infertility." HHS says the cuts "reflect HHS priorities and programmatic assessments—not the Secretary's security needs."
Waste &
Cover-Up
While DOGE cut food assistance for struggling Americans, the Pentagon blew through $93.4 billion in a single month — a record 'use-it-or-lose-it' spending binge that included millions on luxury food and a $98,000 piano — and the administration systematically dismantled financial transparency across the government.
• $6.9 million on lobster tail
• $2 million on Alaskan king crab
• $15 million+ on ribeye steak
• A $98,329 Steinway grand piano for the Air Force chief of staff's home
• $225 million in furniture
The luxury items are a fraction of the $93.4B total — but the hypocrisy is the point: austerity for the poor, luxury for the powerful.
• Deputy Defense Secretary Steve Feinberg may keep paying Cerberus, the firm he founded, for services with no end date, while at least four Cerberus-owned companies hold Golden Dome contracts
• Todd Blanche held at least $159,000 in crypto-related assets when he shut down crypto investigations as deputy attorney general
• Pam Bondi and other officials made well-timed stock trades, at times selling just before tariff announcements sank markets
• Trade Representative Jamieson Greer withheld the names of more than 50 former clients
All while Trump fired 17 inspectors general and removed the head of the Office of Government Ethics.
• The Bureau of Labor Statistics produces independent economic data
• The BLS Commissioner was fired after publishing data the administration didn't like
• The message: produce favorable numbers or lose your job
When the government fires statisticians for reporting accurate data, the public loses its ability to know what's actually happening in the economy.
Testing the
Talking Points
The administration and its supporters offer specific justifications. Here is each claim, tested against the record.
"DOGE is saving taxpayer money."
DOGE promised $2 trillion in savings and delivered $215 billion — barely 10% of the promise.
More importantly, DOGE's leader holds $300 billion in conflicts of interest and was exempted from financial disclosure. The cuts targeted food assistance, federal workers, and programs for vulnerable populations — while contracts benefiting Musk's companies remained untouched.
Saving money for taxpayers while protecting your own government contracts isn't efficiency. It's self-dealing with a PR strategy.
"The IRS lawsuit is a legitimate legal dispute."
The president appoints the IRS Commissioner. The president directs the DOJ that would defend the IRS. The president described it as needing to "work out a settlement with myself."
This is not plaintiff vs. defendant. This is the same person on both sides of the case. The president controls the agency being sued and the lawyers defending it.
A $10 billion lawsuit where the plaintiff controls the defense isn't litigation. It's a withdrawal from the Treasury with extra steps.
"These are normal government expenditures."
$6.9 million on lobster, $2 million on king crab, a $98,329 Steinway piano, and $225 million in furniture — spent in a single month. These are luxury purchases buried inside a $93.4 billion "use-it-or-lose-it" spending rush.
The contrast tells the story: DOGE cuts SNAP benefits — food for families who can't afford groceries — while the Pentagon buys millions in shellfish and six-figure musical instruments.
If these are "normal" expenditures, then why is DOGE cutting food assistance to save money? You can't simultaneously claim the Pentagon budget is normal and claim austerity is necessary for programs that feed the poor.
The president sues his own agencies. His appointees use government resources for personal benefit. The richest man in the world cuts programs for the poor while protecting his own contracts. This isn't corruption in the system — it is the system.